International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences

Comparison between clinical finding and magnetic resonance imaging finding of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc

2020, Volume 6 Issue 4

Comparison between clinical finding and magnetic resonance imaging finding of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc

Author(s): Dr. Sahil Singla, Dr. Rajan Sharma, Dr. Rohit Sharma, Dr. Arshpreet Singh, Dr. Arshpreet Singh Dhillon and Dr. Satinderpal Kaur Satti
Abstract: Background: Lower back ache is most common problems seen in working population. Prolapsed intervertebral disc is one of the most common cause. Magnetic resonance imaging is the diagnostic test of choice. Disc herniation of the same size may be asymptomatic in one patient and can lead to severe nerve root compromise in another patient. So, aim and objective of the study is to compare MRI with clinical findings.
Material and Method: This study was conducted on total 60 with chief complaint of LBA was screened for inclusion in study. They underwent MRI of Lumbosacral region. All data collected and Analysed Statistically by Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: Total 60 patients with age group between 20-50 years mean age 37.60±6.36, 45% manual Laboure, male predominance, duration 7-12 months, radiculopathy in 90% patients, SLR was positive in 82% cases. MRI was abnormal in all patients with most common finding being disc bulge 53.3%, most common level being L4-L5 and L5-S1 followed by disc degeneration, neural canal compromise. Total MRI diagnosed level L3-L4(14), L4-L5(39), L5-S1(45) and while total clinically diagnosed levels are L3-L4(4), L4-L5(23), L5-S1(33).Pearson correlation coefficient between disc degeneration-neural compromise(.577), disc degeneration-VAS (.319), disc degeneration-sensory(.360), disc degeneration-power(.417).
Conclusion: In this study Significant association has been observed between MRI finding and clinical findings in most of the patients but not all MRI findings are clinically symptomatic in patients. So, this is concluded that treating physician should put more emphasis on history, clinical examination, and make the inference by these and then should correlate the clinical findings with that of MRI to reach a final diagnosis.
Pages: 670-674  |  820 Views  295 Downloads
How to cite this article:
Dr. Sahil Singla, Dr. Rajan Sharma, Dr. Rohit Sharma, Dr. Arshpreet Singh, Dr. Arshpreet Singh Dhillon, Dr. Satinderpal Kaur Satti. Comparison between clinical finding and magnetic resonance imaging finding of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc. Int J Orthop Sci 2020;6(4):670-674. DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i4j.2401
 
International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences
Call for book chapter